![]() ![]() Adding to this issue is that performance optimization is more difficult to achieve when using SQLite. As the database grows the memory requirement also increases, SQLite's performance will degrade. ![]() In terms of scalability, SQLite is well suited to for smaller databases. MySQL has a fine-grained user management system which can handle multiple users and grant various levels of access. SQLite does not include user management functionality and so, it is not suitable for multiple user access. This includes authentication with a username, password, and connection over SSH. Meanwhile, MySQL comes with many inbuilt security features. Hence, the database files can be accessed by anyone. ![]() SQLite does not have an inbuilt authentication mechanism. As the same time, MySQL also has more setup guides available to help with this. ![]() On the other hand, MySQL requires significantly more configuration as compared to SQLite. Security and Ease of SetupĪs alluded to in the previous section, SQLite requires little to no configuration, making it extremely easy to set up. For larger databases, this can be a time-consuming process. Moreover, no configurations are required, and the process can be done using minimal support.īefore copying or exporting a MySQL database, you need to condense it into a single file. The SQLite library is about 250 KB in size, while the MySQL server is about 600 MB. The database file format is cross-platform and may be copied between 32-bit and 64-bit systems.All tables, indices, triggers, and views, are contained within a single disk file.SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files.Does not have a separate server process (unlike most other SQL databases).Implements an embedded, server-less, zero-configuration, transactional SQL database engine.This is apparent when viewing it's main design features: SQLite was designed and built with storage and portability in mind. Since you are probably more familiar with MySQL, this tutorial will list SQLite's most important features, as well as dissimilitudes to MySQL, all with the goal of steering you towards the product that will best suit your needs. Yet, beyond these similarities, the two databases are dissimilar in several important respects. Both are fast, cross-platform, robust, and feature-rich. SQLite and MySQL are equally popular open source Relational Database Management Systems (RDBMS). var myString= db.CreateCommand(" select SqlColumn from tablewithsqlcommands where Procname=theprocedureIwant").ExecuteScalar() ) and then execute it in the second step ( var myResult= db.CreateCommand(myString).What Is SQLite and How Does It Differ from MySQL? by Robert Gravelle If you really want to store SQL code in the DB (such as when you want to develop cross-platform apps), you can create a specific table that will store raw SQL commands that do the thing, then in the client you obtain the SQL command (e.g. I've done this in C# using DevArt's SQLite to implement password hashing. You can however extend SQLite with your own user defined functions in the host language (PHP, Python, Perl, C#, Javascript, Ruby etc). Given that it run as a DLL in your current process it makes more sense to implement SP in the client language. This makes sense for database engines designed to work as a network connected service but the imperative for SQLite is much less. Solution 2Ī key reason for having stored procs in a database is that you're executing SP code in the same process as the SQL engine. See Appropriate Uses For SQLite on the main site. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |